It's terrible. Samyang 135mm F/2 ED UMC Review (Camera Labs), Does a F/2.0 lens become F/2.8 when used on a crop sensor camera? Has a good weight to it. Thanks.. sigh, overdone bokeh and centre sharpness bear little relevance to the art of this hobby. Thanks, Please re-enable javascript to access full functionality. However, these APOs have a couple of drawbacks. If canon puts an IS on this lens, it would be perfect! Really excels as indoor sports lens on a crop camera. The focuser adjustment ring on the Rokinon 135mm F/2 is excellent, but fine-tuning your critical focus on a bright star at F/2 will take some trial and error to get right. No, Mr. The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion (ED) lens element to control chromatic aberration, and ultra multi-coatings (UMC) to both improve light transmission and reduce flare. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. But she might as well be in front of a green screen. Rokinon 135mm F2.0 ED Lens. http://www.astrovale-f-2/index.html, Hi Lord_Vader, Plus it is harder to attach than other lens hoods. I use it for everything, landscapes, townscapes, interesting detail, portraits. I would! Using the lens's diaphragm interferes with the light path and results in diffraction spikes which I find unattractive. Lens hood - when I bought this lens years ago the included hood was rather cheap (perhaps Canon has updated the hood) by comparison with other hoods. Because of some residual chromatic aberration even with the aperture stop, the best focus lies not where the star image is the smallest, but rather just slightly away from infinity, at the point where the star image barely begins to enlarge. The Rho Ophiuchi Cloud Complex by Eric Cauble using the Samyang 135mm F/2 lens. You don't have to worry about shopping for a better lens anymore. Also, when used as recommended, and properly guided at full camera resolution, they are all comparable to a field-corrected APO, producing perfect images from edge to edge which can be easily cropped 25% with no evidence of aberrations. This includes everything from the rich star fields of Sagittarius, to a complete look at the Andromeda Galaxy. Im currently shooting with a Canon 60D. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get. (purchased for $899), reviewed December 9th, 2006 Pleiades (M45) Orion Nebula (M42) Carina Nebula (shown below) North American Nebula; Heart and Soul Nebula (IC 1805 / IC 1848) Some people like these, and consider them decorative. Off topic, Oh and it's stabilised. Thanks for sharing your thoughts.No disagreement here. Target for bortle 9 astrophotography? Then you should have tried the 180mm nikkor ED, the old one, which is the favorite tool of a lot of astrophotographers. I want to see the bokeh and the sharpness at 100% mag, don't care about the photos. Tack sharp even at wide open aperture. So so far the best that I have used are the 200f2.8L and the 400f5.6L. http://www.idyll.com/laney2014 (purchased for $650), reviewed June 6th, 2008 (purchased for $900), reviewed December 14th, 2006 The 135mm Rokinon with the Canon Rebel seems like a pretty good setup. Ive spent a handful of nights testing this lens in my Bortle Scale Class 6/7 backyard, and my results live up to the hype it gets in terms of astrophotography performance. This lens has the Pentax K bayonet mount, and requires the K-EOS adapter for attachment to Canon EOS cameras. Just plain black plastic (no interior felt as in newer lens hoods). The only thing that could possibly make this better would be to add IS. I cant wait to try this lens out during the winter months on some wide-field targets in Orion. One of them is simplicity: A clear, simple subject that constitutes a shape, standing out and contrasting against a calm and simple background. Sure, that would be swellbut it doesn't matter with regard to how it performs. (Suggesting that diffraction limiting is only part of the story with lens softness at tiny apertures.). Its nice to have the F/2. Its fast f/2.0 maximum aperture is effective in low light and enables shallow depth of field control. Not another article that promotes portraits shot with wide open lens and out of focus highlights in the background. Nothing else like it and the reason the two DC lenses have remained in production since they were introduced in 1993. https://www.dpreview.com/galleries/1180017085/photos/3721717/bokeh. (cont. Some lenses are incurable. Since I am interested in wide field astrophotography, I bought a new, unmodified, Canon 600D body for use with telephoto lenses. Great looking lens, if you ever saw it from the front. At f/32, it's pretty soft, but less so than a lot of lenses at that aperture. But do some experimenting before you decide. It must not be confused with the much cheaper SMC Takumar, often deceptively advertised as SMC Pentax Takumar, which has the M42 camera thread, and is plagued with unextinguishable blue chromatic aberration. Testing on an EOS-5D, we see that it's sharpness is almost as good wide open in the corners as on the EOS-20D with its smaller sensor. Barney and Chris have been shooting the new Sony 50mm F1.4 GM, and we have a bunch of full resolution samples for you to peruse. Used with a FF body the DOF can be unforgiving, but if you nail focus the results can be magnificent. Zoom lenses are entirely unsuitable for astrophotography due to prominent aberrations of every kind. The main problem with the old lenses is spherical aberration and colour error, especially pronounced on digital sensors. Pocketable. Canon EOS 60Da with the Rokinon 135mm F/2 lens. Also, we ought never question or diminish the joy of others. The 70-200 f2.8 L2 and he 400f5.6 will however set you back way more than $1.100. However, for $15 I also bought an old Tamron Adaptall 2, 135 mm f2.5. Have not used a 70-200 since. 135 mm. (purchased for $1,000), reviewed February 4th, 2010 The Rokinon 135mm F/2 ED UMC. Its a joy to work with every time. Along with improvements in telescope mounts, camera technology, filters, and digital image processing, these have allowed amateurs to produce astrophotographs of nearly professional quality. Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC LensCheck Price (Amazon): https://amzn.to/2MOUFeOExample Images: https://astrobackyard.com/rokinon-135mm-f2-astrophotography/I've . Now I have only the Nikon but I can try to take a photo of the same subject fully open It would not surprise me if modern lenses were useable at full aperture. - in my subjects' skin. Just like the above samples, most are just bad. Excellent color and saturation, a virtually perfect lens. DPReview March Madness, round one - vote! It just doesn't get any better than this! Canon 300/4 ED IF AF (non-IS) At least not in my camera (Sony A6000), the focal length in a crop sensor does not make it very suitable for portrait, the photo detail is something else, but without AF that type of photography with that focal distance and at least 80 cm of the subject it requires too much dedication, with how comfortable the DMF approach mode is for that type of photography Also in my mount it does not have any communication with the camera (it does not have a chip, it only has it for Nikon). Still, all things considered, I prize this lens very highly and can not imagine giving it up. OTOH you can now get a 70-180 f2.8 zoom that weights virtually the same and is only a tiny bit longer (Tamron's on E mount, like 20mm longer than the AF SY or most other modern 135s), and there's lighter than ever 85/1.4s (eg Sigma's DN for L/E mount) that can achieve a very similar look while coming in at 600g, tho at an even higher price. Maybe try a 400mm f/2.0 to see it that one's got enough blur. It has no chromatic aberration, and no hint of star deformities in the corners. Over the years, Ive shot deep-sky targets at varying focal lengths from 50mm to over 1000mm. You will never be able to beat this lense, believe me, i have tried them all. Several functions may not work. tanie i dobre opinie 9 opatek lub Biznes HUMAN Sport Insect Architektura Specjalne Krajobrazy Martwa natura Podry People 2023 Obiektyw o staej ogniskowej Nevertheless, it performs excellently on most star fields, and is too cheap not to acquire. - posted in Beginning Deep Sky Imaging: I have recently received my star adventurer and as of now only have the star adventurer, benro tripod (super stable), and a unmodded canon t2i with only a 18-55mm lens. If you shoot things in motion on a Canon body, and need some reach without massive bulk, this is the one I recommend. Beautiful portrait lens. The combination of a wide aperture and very little light lost in transmission makes very high shutter speeds possible. There are a total of 8 stops actually written on the lens. When I got home and loaded the photo into Lightroom I was blown away by two things. Simple as that! It's a technical review about a couple of lens attributes. When attached to a DSLR camera with a full frame sensor, the lens offers a massive 15.5 x 10.6 field of view, or 18.8 across the diagonal. For DPReview, it's also an opportunity for a good old-fashioned camera fight. Try to have eyes and nose / lips all in focus. Without the blurb I would have taken it as a 24 hour news studio shot with back projection or a cut and paste layer.The other stuff is really nice though. I already did some trials with the Samyang 12mm lens. Diffraction from the cheap EF-s kit zoom lens was uneven. I have never had a bad experience buying used Canon lenses from eBay sellers with 99.5%+ positive feedback. Great lens, but I can't understand why Canon can't control quality. I was very happy for this reason to eventually get a full frame DSLR in 2007 and sell the 85mm lens and buy a 105mm one to replace it. The sigma 150mm f2.8 tests very well, zeiss 135mm apo sonnar, and leica 180mm f3.5 apo all proven performers on star tests. The original poster is right that it was a compromise though and stopping down was necessary for critical sharpness and a better image. To fit the Heart and Soul Nebulae in a single frame requires an extremely wide field of view (compared to the magnification of most telescopes). I got this lens because of portraiture. We think it rises to the challenge. If anything the argument in favor of even smaller and lighter 85/1.4s (like the 600g Sigma DN) is stronger than ever, and I say that as someone that loves shooting at 135-150mm. Amazing for portraits, easily fast enough for indoor sports. If you don't like that article that's your right as a member. As you can see, the magnification of the lens used will dictate the type of projects you shoot. Nice article for beginners.It's all in the eyes of the beholder. Ive been using kit lenses for the past year, favoring the Nikkor 50mm 2.8. f/2! Lots of older lenses no longer satisfy. Nothing just makes sense about the review -- the writer does not really understand the lens he is reviewing, very basic concepts are wrong. I had both for a while. I have taken some of the coolest photos with this lens on a canon mark III which shoots ten frames per second. The Rokinon 135mm F/2.0 ED UMC lens is a fantastic companion for the Canon 60Da, as it offers a useful "mid-range" focal length for a variety of deep-sky projects. I am not really looking at buying anything else, though. I almost bought one, but couldn't manage that focal length and DoF with moving subjects and manual focus. The presentation and hands-on look and feel of the 135mm F/2 lens is impressive considering the reasonable price of this lens. I am a complete amateur at photography in general and this is all new to me so thank you for all the information and videos. A camera tracker (or star tracker) is necessary for long exposure deep-sky astrophotography, but a compact model such as the iOptron SkyTracker or Sky-Watcher Star Adventurer will do just fine. The Canon EF 135mm f/2L USM Lens makes an excellent indoor sports lens. Fantastic IQ & Bokeh. To prevent damage to the lens finish, apply nylon acorn nuts (or cap nuts) to the tips of the retaining ring's three alignment screws. The full extent of the relationship between Rokinon and Samyang is unknown to me, but the packaging on my lens says Technology by Samyang Optics. Great reach for street shots. So now your 42Mpix A7rII is only a 10.5Mpix. Such "full spectrum" cameras are somewhat more sensitive in the ultraviolet, but much more sensitive in the deep red and infrared. However, I am convinced that its large aperture and fast F ratio would perform exceptionally well in three color or narrow band H-alpha and OIII photography. Comment * document.getElementById("comment").setAttribute( "id", "a0721c0ca7d0974fd27b5d0ceb81918a" );document.getElementById("cfd2c22fe2").setAttribute( "id", "comment" ); Your email address will not be published. enlarge. It seems they are now quite comparable in quality to prime lenses. As if absolutely clueless Youtube instructors who have no idea what they are talking about weren't enough. parts of your main subject extend beyond the DOF range it will never look flat. Available 03/21/23. So, for Joe User or especially for Jane Client, one really has to look closely to see much of a difference. The flawless image quality is only half the story though. Focus are dead on with my Fullframe or APS system. This new, affordable wide zoom for L-mount is capable of some excellent landscapes. (purchased for $700), reviewed June 13th, 2009 This summer I'm going to try the lenses out for LRGB images to see how they perform. Hey! (Dpreview), Use the 500 Rule to find the Perfect Exposure Length for Astrophotography, Use a DSLR Ha Filter for Astrophotography, AstroBackyard | Astrophotography Tips and Tutorials2023, Optical Construction: 11 Glass elements in 7 Groups. You are entitled to your opinions, and I respect that! As rest you do just by cropping or stitching. It requires the Contax-EOS adapter for attachment to the camera. Everyone assumes their definition is the "true" one. I heard it's very sharp and well corrected. Finally, to prevent image shift during exposure, all telephoto lenses must be supported at two points: at the camera end, and at the far end with a large retaining ring. I found this highly restrictive for shooting indoors where there was seldom enough distance between me with my camera and my subject(s). The Image Sensor Frame tool lets you enter in the size of your camera sensor, and focal length of your lens (or telescope) to display a frame over the star map. The lens shows a very slight pincushion distortion, but it's well under 0.1% of frame height, an excellent performance by any measure. An h-alpha filter would still be useful for your D500, but much more so if it were modified! It has just a hint of chromatic aberration on very bright stars and, if highly enlarged by 400-800%, the stars in the very corners barely begin to show a touch of astigmatism. Some people do not like this and consider Bokeh to refer only to the rendering of out of focus points of light. That is the story.#7: Leaves.That doesn't work. I would love to see his test images. Neutral yet very nice colours. Chromatic aberration is almost eliminated in narrowband, so lenses with that problem may be fine performers. That is kind of the point I am trying to make -- These pictures are really not in another league. I actually have to walk 1/2 way up the stairs to be able get folk in the frame. But you couldn't have because you don't know even as much as this guy. It is sharp but somehow not that analytic way as a macro lens. It actually makes my eyes water as I try to resolve how bad the blurriness is. What you need to know is the author is a hobbyist and hands his images over to px500, the bottom of the barrel so of course he is impressed, he doesnt use top flight gear day in, day out to earn his pay. Well saturated but neutral. I also find the other photos not very good. Interesting that ancient, low-tech (no ED glass, no special coatings) non-apo telephotos could produce decent results compared to something modern. 135mm F2.0 The optical design includes one extra-low dispersion lens element to control chromatic aberration, contributing to sharp, color-accurate imaging, and each of its lens elements features Ultra Multi-Coating to improve light transmission and reduce ghosting and flare. Bye So there - it is not a perfect object. I used Canon's 135 f/2 for ten years. Due to the weight, at times I didn't move my shooting position and just zoomed to a composition that worked. Well, for me. I think the bokeh won me over with the cat, as well as the fact that I like animals; the case for the duck was the same. Everyone should have one? Holiday Savings $50 . In this buying guide we've rounded-up several great cameras for shooting sports and action, and recommended the best. We take OM System's new 90mm prime F3.5 macro lens out and about around Seattle, in search of sunlight, people and very tiny things to get up close and personal with. I do know, however, that I can take an equally framed photo I've shot with my Canon kit lens, both zoomed to 100% I run circles around this guy. All of them are extremely sharp and produce mouth-watering bokeh, and all of them are reasonably priced for what you get.". For that I would investigate alternatives just to make sure. It could easily rival 'bokeh monsters lenses' at fraction of their price. So I feel I'm being cheated. If You can afford it, buy it! Panasonic 35-100mm f2.8. Magical images, great AF, great close focusing abilities. Most of these APOs have F ratios around 6.5, and are unable to comprehend in their field of view large celestial objects such as the Andromeda galaxy, the North America nebula, and comets. From the moment I reviewed the first sub-exposure on the display screen of my camera, I feel in love with the mid-range magnification of a 135mm lens.
The Informer 2 Release Date,
Israel Battres Ethnic Background,
Motorcycle Accident Manitowoc County,
Articles C