. When a movie gets rave reviews as a mind-blowing flick about quantum physics, it's worth checking out. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramthas School of Enlightenment. Interspersed with Amanda's woes and the pseudoscience are random attacks on organized religion. I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. Columbus certainly didn't speak the language, and the locals didn't keep written records. Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. I think its a good idea for people to consider the example of Hagelin: hes completely delusional and has zero common sense, but able to function at a high level in the particle theory community. 3) Lots of people still hunger for a magical universe, and now hope that science can deliver it, after Nietsche's announcement of God's death. It's hard to say where Candace Pert got the low-down on what the Native American Indians did or didn't see when Columbus and the gang hit the horizon. The film has a web-site, and there is a long article in Salon explaining that the whole thing is really the production of a cult based in the Pacific Northwest that believes that a woman named JZ Knight is able to channel a 35,000 year old mystic named Ramtha. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. Directors William Arntz, Betsy Chasse Starring Marlee Matlin, Elaine Hendrix, John Ross Bowie Genres Featuring two (!) is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. [7], According to Publishers Weekly, the film was one of the sleeper hits of 2004, as "word-of-mouth and strategic marketing kept it in theaters for an entire year." He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. The bits and pieces of matter that make up sub-atomic particles (protons, neutrons and electrons) don't exist in any handy, measurable way unless they're interacting with one another. My main objection is to the "blessed water" segment which was utter bull****, but the rest of the movie is ok and is designed to start people . The film "What the Bleep Do We Know?!" Q: But isn't everything really connected? We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." I was really impressed and although it sounded totally crazy, the Einsteinian language that their brochures were using had nearly convinced me that they really know something about fundamental physics. Our work isn't possible without your support. If it's true, no one's been able to measure it or see the effects. As long as a sub-atomic particle is interacting with another sub-atomic particle, they'll both exist regardless of where you are or what you're doing. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. Where were we now? Is this a hoax to promote positivity? If I didnt know any better, I would have thought it was something straight out of a Cheech and Chong movie. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Details in the video itself.EXTENDED REFERENCES:Revelation:[a] Michael Freze, 1993, Voices, Visions, and Apparitions, OSV Publishing ISBN 087973454X page 252[b] http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith[c] http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=confidence[d] http://www.thefreedictionary.com/faith[e] http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/faith[f] Dictionary.com. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." and published a study guide. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. There are also controlled, double-blind prayer studies out there much more interesting than the D.C. crime study cited in the film, though not necessarily more convincing. Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Pingback: Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Pingback: Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, Pingback: For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. And if you really want to be friendly, ask me about "The Case forPluto.". suggest that science allows you to capitalize on quantum possibilities, but theoretical physicist Lawrence Krauss says it's just a load of bleep. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. Monitor journalism changes lives because we open that too-small box that most people think they live in. Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. "What The Bleep Do We Know? Q. 7. If your mind is the "observer" that quantum physics talks about, you should be able to choose which of the many possible realities around you comes into existence you can create your own reality, and probably come off anti-anxiety medication to boot. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". The following persons in the film have all spoken at RSE and sold books there. A group of 3 Indian people claiming to be direct disciples of Maharishi Mahesh-Yogi visited our high school. has been described as "a kind of New Age answer to The Passion of the Christ and other films that adhere to traditional religious teachings. Mon August 23, 2021: The US Food and Drug Administration on Monday granted full approval to the Pfizer/BioNTech Covid-19 vaccine for people age 16 and older. It presents itself as the thinking rebel's alternative to Hollywood pabulum: a heady stew of drama and documentary, starring Oscar-winning actress Marlee Matlin as a Xanax-addled photographer who. On the whole they were a bunch of complete flakes, although one of them (David Albert) is a philosopher of science here at Columbia. But we behave like classical objects for a reason: We're big, we have lots of particles, they interact. last of a series of columns written for Scientific American, Why great minds can't grasp consciousness. Your subscription to you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. The 2004 theatrical release was succeeded by a substantially changed, extended home media version in 2006. During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. Fred Allen Wolf And you'd do the study without knowing what had been 'said' to the water specimens, so your subjective opinions wouldn't colour the results. Krauss discussed his criteria ln our interview last week. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. This will be revisited if any. Doesn't the quantum world pervade everything that we see around us? was heavily criticised for being "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. ?Discovering the Endless Possibilities of Your Everyday Reality. To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. [11], Scientists who have reviewed What the Bleep Do We Know!? The movie contains interviews from such leaders in their fields as: Candace. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. John Hagelin, PhD, describes a study he did in Washington in 1992. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. Never mind that the movie didnt even have a plot. There's also much to be said for the idea that divine is not so much a separate entity but is found in the interconnectedness of the universe, something both traditional religious believers and "spiritual but not" people often agree on, though semantics can get in the way. Use these social-bookmarking links to share What the bleep are they on about?. A: Absolutely. Dr Emoto takes photos of crystals formed in freezing water. The main weird thing about them was they were printed on pink paper instead of white. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Consciousness must be involved. Cast. You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles. By continuing to browse the site Dr Joe Dispenza and Miceal Ledwith are both long time students and appointed teachers at Ramthas school of enlightenment (RSE). Down The Rabbit Hole\". The Bleep in a Nutshell: 1. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. The sub-atomic particles that make up the atoms that make up the rock are there too." And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. Producing, scripting, and co-directing the film, What the BLEEP went on to become a global phenomenon, with well over 100 million viewers experiencing the BLEEP. Once they do bump into each other they form their regular little selves. But it's not true for the universe at large. The film was also discussed in a letter published in Physics Today that challenges how physics is taught, saying teaching fails to "expose the mysteries physics has encountered [and] reveal the limits of our understanding". This movie agrees with the scientists as far as the existence of the so called empty space is concerned. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. Filmed to promote a new age philosophy based on a very, very broad interpretation of quantum physics, the movie was funded by J. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. It's there. That would be, very hard to quantify:). http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? It's certainly not. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? Wow, indeed! You might think that meant there were 18% fewer violent crimes than in the previous year, but the decrease was actually relative to his predicted increase based on some fancy statistical footwork. What the #$*! As the discussion moves from science to pop psychology, the film s endorsement of Ramtha s School Of Enlightenment and its simplistic self-improvement mantra becomes clear. Her perceptions of reality are challenged and she begins to realise how the material world is impacted by the consciousness of individuals and groups. At some point I guess he updated it to string field theory and the version you provided a link for. Hobbs also discusses Hagelin's experiment with Transcendental Meditation and the Washington DC rate of violent crime, saying that "the number of murders actually went up". Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. As the sample size grows, so does the scientist's confidence in the statistical inferences drawn from the large sample. [19], According to Margaret Wertheim, "History abounds with religious enthusiasts who have read spiritual portent into the arrangement of the planets, the vacuum of space, electromagnetic waves and the big bang. Water beamed messages of love or gratitude formed itself into lovely snowflake-like crystals; water exposed to the words "You make me sick" looks like the surface of a toxic waste pond. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). Z. Knight and heavily features commentary from 'Ramtha', an ancient Atlantian general who is apparently speaking through Knight. That's not the case. Beyond fear, beyond anger. Real news, real hope. This is the first coronavirus vaccine approved by the FDA, and is expected to open the door to more vaccine mandates. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. You can't change the world by thinking about it. Amit Gotswami Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Hidden Dimensions, Rachels Musings Rabbit Holes and Other Oddities, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Philosophy of Science on Blogginheads.tv, For "The Baby Goes Out With The Bathwater" Crowd - SLUniverse Forums. A: Well, Roger Penrose has given lots of new-age crackpots ammunition by suggesting that at some fundamental scale, quantum mechanics might be relevant for consciousness. List of films featuring the deaf and hard of hearing, "How the NXIVM Sex Cult Defended Trump from Media Attacks", "Cinefex article detailing the visual effects for the film", "New Age: What the Bleep? Interspersed with the plot were interviews with various supposed scientists with something to say about quantum physics, consciousness, God, etc. You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. But I assume that's not quite right, and that sometimes quantum mechanics' name is taken in vain. 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. People latch onto their dreams, and they always try to match them to reality. They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." Not everything is possible. log out. 3. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. There are lots of things in quantum mechanics that sound like magic. 1. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. Regular indicators of violent crime told a different story the number of murders actually went up. Reality is happening in our brain all the time we're receiving it but it's not being integrated." Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. " " " !". 3. Some lost their entire life savings. Also, the movie suggests that the quantum idea of matter embracing all its possible states at once applies to the larger world of people and rocks. Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. Particles are fluctuations the rules of physics say it's perfectly fine for them to exist at some time and/or place and to be non-existent at another time and/or place. This is an explanation to help understand what might be going on, but it is not part of the theory because it is not falsifiable: it cannot be tested in such a way that, if it were false, it would fail the test (without falsifying the whole of quantum mechanics, and therefore all the other interpretations too). [an error occurred while processing this directive]. No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. But are there new, weird applications that people might see that have an impact on everyday life, beyond the woo-woo? "What the Bleep Do We Know?" is a trendy new movie that combines the worst elements of a snooze-worthy PBS documentary, a "change your mind, change your life" self-help book, and a Bugs. The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Author, speaker, and award-winning Writer/Director/Producer Mark Vicente was part of the creative team behind the sleeper hit "What The Bleep Do We Know?!". 34 talking about this. The researchers' bottom line: Quantum physics is about matter at its most fundamental levels and matter's interactions; it's not about spirituality. A moment in which 'the mathematical formalisms of quantum mechanics [] are stripped of all empirical content and reduced to a set of syrupy nostrums'. That's why we experience a classical world. A moderately low-budget independent film, it was promoted using viral marketing methods and opened in art-house theaters in the western United States, winning several independent film awards before being picked up by a major distributor and eventually grossing over $10 million. "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". I suggest to read him if you want to know how QM is perceived in the SF community. Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. To the blessed memory of all ISHEAGU Indigenes (Anioma) slain by the Nigerian Army on 2ND MAY 1968. However, it contends that the empty space is not that empty, it is only the human mind that is unable to see beyond the emptiness. The movie "What the Bleep do we know" How much is true, or just entertainment. He even called in to a radio program the director was on to discuss this and was cut off. We are connected to the world by many things: by light and sound and heat. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. This website uses cookies to Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." 1. If quantum physics baffled the late Dr. Feynman, one of its most brilliant explorers, then no one should feel embarrassed for failing to understand the subject. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Study Guide", "Teaching physics mysteries versus pseudoscience", "Review: What The Bleep Do We Know!? There's nothing wrong with that. - - Short Range Tests of Newtons Inverse-Square Law. "Particles appear and disappear where do they go when they're not here? What the Bleep Do We Know!? The Christian Science Monitor has expired. After a lesson in quantum mechanics from a precocious kid on a . Present thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but,. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); document.getElementById( "ak_js_2" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); WatchDocumentaries.com | Games | Quizzes | Contact |Privacy & Terms | Manage Cookies |Advertise | DMCA, Aleister Crowley: The Wickedest Man in the World. - Dr. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. In fact, "you are God in the making," which explains why Shirley MacLaine is a Ramtha fan. You can begin to be skeptical that the speaker is somehow trying to use quantum mechanics to argue fundamentally that you can change the world by thinking about it. I guess it's a sign that quantum physics is entering the mainstream A: Well, yeah, the point is that there have been these new-age desires for lots of things to make the world better: crystals, energy vortices. Categories conflate, confound, connect", "Our power is in our ability to decide - Can you? Featuring interviews with scientists and theologians, this compelling film thrusts the viewer into a world where science and spirituality intersect. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! Many people are dubious that Penrose's suggestions are reasonable, because the brain is not an isolated quantum-mechanical system. Adapted from "Ask the Everyday Scientist" with permission of the writer. Only the Shaman knows, and we're about 500 years too late to ask him. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2005/06/30/2839498.htm? By clicking 'Send to a friend' you agree ABC Online is not responsible for the content contained in your email message. Intercut with these metaphysical ponderings is a soapy fictional narrative starring Marlee Matlin as a broken-hearted photographer. 4. The point is, with quantum mechanics, everything doesn't go. (stylized as What t #$*! Those points suggest that quantum-derived "possibilities" affect the wider world, that human thought is the ultimate arbiter of physical reality, and that by manipulating thought properly, people can achieve harmony and even shape the structure of matter. Amanda is a photographer, who seems to be highly skilled but not very successful professionally. If anyone has any information to refute any of the facts laid out here, I will be more then willing to retract them. improve functionality and performance. "The movie is saying that somehow we can all get together and, with our collective thought processes, we can influence the outcome" of physical events - be they life experiences or scientific. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? What was new? The part where the scientist put water under a microscope that was sitting under the label "I hate you" or "I want to kill you" Looked distorted and dirty but water blessed by monks was uniform and beautiful.